OPEN ACCESS
One of the great advances of the 20th century was the rise of a formal systems science and systems thinking. This progress influenced ecology in ways that provided new insight to the structure and function of ecosystems using tools from thermodynamics, networks, information theory, and more. We have been able to increase our understanding of how ecosystems function in terms of using available energy to create complex structures to move away from thermodynamic equilibrium and how these self-organizing structures adapt to changing situations. Ecological goal functions can measure this orientation of ecosystem growth and development (EGD). This presentation addresses how these metrics attuned for ecosystems have relevant application in socio-economic systems. In particular, energy network science is a new paradigm that draws from thermodynamics, information theory, and network analysis to assess the organization, patterns, and dynamics of diverse systems such as ecosystems, financial systems, and urban metabolism. Our understanding of sustainable systems is informed by knowing how ecological and other far-from-thermodynamic equilibrium systems create, maintain, and sustain their functional activities. This approach builds from the seminal efforts of systems thinkers such as Gregory Bateson, Buzz Holling, Jane Jacobs, Sven Jørgensen, Donella Meadows, Jacob Moreno, Bernard Patten, Joseph Tainter, Robert Ulanowicz, and Ilya Prigogine.
Autocatalysis, Ecological goal functions, Network analysis, Succession, Sustainability, Systems ecology, Thermodynamics
[1] Weaver, W.A., Quarter Century in the Natural Sciences, The Rockefeller Foundation Annual Report, New York, 1958.
[2] Patten, B.C., Fath, B.D. & Choi, J.S., Complex adaptive hierarchical systems—background. In: Understanding and Solving Environmental Problems in the 21st Century, eds. R. Costanza, S.E. Jorgensen, Elsevier Science Ltd: London, England, pp. 41–94, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044111-5/50005-6
[3] Onsager, L., Reciprocal relations in irreversible processes. Physical Review, 38, pp. 2265–2279, 1931. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.38.2265
[4] Jørgensen, S.E. & Svirezhev, Y.M., Towards a Thermodynamic Theory for Ecological Systems. Elsevier. 2004.
[5] Odum, H.T. & Pinkerton, R.C., Time’s speed regulator: the optimum efficiency for maximum power output in physical and biological systems. American Scientist, 43, pp. 331–343, 1955.
[6] Prigogine, I., Thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes, John Wiley & Son: New York, 1955.
[7] Tansley, A.G., The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology, 16, 284– 307, 1935. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1930070
[8] Odum, E.P., The strategy of ecosystem development. Science, 164, pp. 262–270, 1969. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.164.3877.262
[9] Sterman, J.D., Communicating climate change risks in a skeptical world. Climatic Change, 108, pp. 811–826, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0189-3
[10] Sweeney, L.B. & Sterman, J.D., Bathtub dynamics: initial results of a systems thinking inventory. System Dynamics Review, 16(4), pp. 249–286, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sdr.198
[11] Holling, C.S., The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems: local surprise and global change. In Sustainable Development of the Biosphere: Interactions Between the World Economy and the Global Environment. eds. W. C. Clarkand & R. E. Munn, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, pp. 292–317, 1986.
[12] Burkhard, B., Fath, B.D., & Müller, F., Adapting the adaptive cycle: hypotheses on the development of ecosystem properties and services. Ecological Modelling 222(16), pp. 2878-2890, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.05.016
[13] Jørgensen, S.E. & Mejer, H.F., A holistic approach to ecological modelling. Ecological Modelling, 7, pp. 169–189, 1979. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3800(79)90068-1
[14] Odum, H.T., Self-organization, transformity, and information. Science, 242, pp. 1132– 1139, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.242.4882.1132
[15] Ulanowicz, R.E., Growth and Development: Ecosystem Phenomenology, Springer-Verlag: New York, 1986.
[16] Müller, F. & Leupelt, M. (eds.), Eco Targets, Goal Functions, and Orientors, SpringerVerlag: New York, 1998.
[17] Morowitz, H.J., Energy Flow in Biology: Biological Organization as a Problem in ¹hermal Physics, New York: Academic Press, 1968.
[18] Schneider, E.D. & Kay, J.J., Complexity and thermodynamics: towards a new ecology. Futures, 24, pp. 626–647, 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(94)90034-5
[19] Cheslak, E.F. & Lamarra, V.A., The residence time of energy as a measure of ecological organization. In Energy and Ecological Modelling, eds. W.J. Mitsch, R.W. Bossermann, & J.M. Klopatek, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 591–600, 1981.
[20] Fath, B.D. & Patten, B.C., Network orientors: “Utility” as a goal function. In Eco Targets, Goal Functions, and Orientors, eds. F. Müller & M. Leupelt, Springer-Verlag: New York, pp. 161–176, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58769-6_10
[21] Patten, B.C., Energy cycling in the ecosystem. Ecological Modelling, 28, pp. 1–71, 1985. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3800(85)90013-4
[22] Jacobs, J., The Nature of Economies, Vintage Books: New York, NY, 2000.
[23] Fath, B.D., Patten, B.C. & Choi, J.S., Complementarity of ecological goal functions. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 208, pp. 493–506, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.2000.2234
[24] Fath, B., Jørgensen, S.E., Patten, B.C. & Straškraba, M., Ecosystem growth and development. Biosystems, 77, pp. 213–228, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2004.06.001
[25] Odum, H.T., Environment, Power, and Society, John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, 1971.
[26] Pirsig, R.M., Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance: An Inquiry into Values, William Morrow Publisher: New York, NY, p. 418, 1974.
[27] Pirsig, R.M., Lila: An inquiry into Morals, Bantam Books: New York, NY, p. 409, 1991.
[28] Zhang, Y., Zheng, H. & Fath, B.D., Analysis of the energy metabolism of urban socioeconomic sectors and the associated carbon footprints: Model development and a case study for Beijing. Energy Policy, 73, pp. 540–551, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.04.029
[29] Zhang, Y., Xia, L., Fath, B.D., Yang, Z., Yin, X., Su, M., Liu, G. & Li, Y., Development of a spatially explicit network model of urban metabolism and analysis of the distribution of ecological relationships: case study of Beijing, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, pp. 4304–4317, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.052
[30] Fath, B.D., Quantifying economic and ecological sustainability. Ocean & Coastal Management, 108, pp. 13–19, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.06.020
[31] Goerner, S., Fiscus, DA. & Fath, BD., Using Energy Network Science (ENS) to connect resilience with the larger story of systemic health and development. Emergence: Complexity & Organization, 17(3), 2015.