OPEN ACCESS
The human dentition shows the general characteristics of a complex adaptive system. Interactions at a molecular level of genetic, epigenetic and environmental factors lead to the emergence of tooth germs. Subsequently differentiated specialised cells control mineralisation and then mature teeth emerge, showing marked variation. The mature dentition provides a record of developmental influences from its initiation at 6 weeks in utero to its completion at 20 years of age. It is, therefore, a valuable paradigm of general development.
The substantial collection of skeletal material of 200–400 AD Romano-Britons from Poundbury, Dorset, has been extensively studied, providing much evidence concerning lifestyle and medical conditions. In this study, we investigate further findings concerning dental development. The aims are to compare the findings with those for Modern Britons and to identify the effects of major factors known to affect the Romano-Britons in order to consider the possible synergism of these effects. The findings were that the patterning of the dentition, its sexual dimorphism and the types of developmental defects were similar to modern Britons. However, the RomanoBritons had more anomalies, generally smaller tooth crowns and roots, and more severe enamel defects. Thus, the Romano-Britons’ dentition showed evidence of insults occurring at all stages of tooth development. These effects, occurring over a long period of time and affecting tissues with different genetic backgrounds, probably arise from ongoing major environmental insults known to be present in Poundbury. These insults have been identified as excess lead ingestion, poor nutrition and recurrent infections. We propose that these factors, acting synergistically, constituted marked environmental stress affecting development.
complex adaptive system, dental development, Romano-British dentition
[1] Brook, A.H., Brook O’Donnell, M., Hone, A., Hart, E., Hughes T.E., Smith, R.N. & Townsend, G.C., General and craniofacial development are complex adaptive processes influenced by diversity. Australian Dental Journal, 59(1 Suppl), pp. 13–22, 2014. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/adj.12158
[2] Farwell, D.E. & Molleston, T., Poundbury – Vol 2 – The cemeteries, Friary Press: Dorchester, UK, 1993.
[3] Lewis, M.E., Life and death in a civitas capital: metabolic disease and trauma in the children from late Roman Dorchester, Dorset. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 142(3), pp. 405–416, 2010. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.21239
[4] Walker, P.L., Bathurst, R.R., Richman, R., Gjerdrum, T. & Andrushko, V.A., The causes of porotic hyperstosis and criba orbitalia: a reappraisal of the iron-deficiency-anaemia hypothesis. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 139(2), pp. 109–125, 2009. doi: http://dx.doi.
org/10.1002/ajpa.21031
[5] Waldron, H.A., Mackie, A. & Townshend, A., The lead content of some Romano-British bones. Archaeometry, 18(2), pp. 221–227, 1976. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4754.1976.tb00165.x
[6] Waldron, H.A., Khera, A., Walker, G., Wibberley, G. & Green, C.J., Lead concentration in bone and soil. Journal of the Archaeological Society, 6, pp. 295–298, 1979. doi: http://dx.doi.
org/10.1016/0305-4403(79)90008-6
[7] Stack, M.V. & Whittaker, D.K., Lead, zinc and calcium concentrations in Romano-British teeth. Journal of Dental Research, 61(4), pp. 563, abstract 244, 1982.
[8] Whittaker, D.K & Stack, M.V., The lead, cadmium and zinc content of some Romano-British teeth.
Archaeometry, 26(1), pp. 37–42, 1984. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4754.1984.tb00315.x
[9] Brook, A.H., Variables and criteria in prevalence studies of dental anomalies of number, form and size. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 3(6), pp. 288–293, 1975. doi: http:// dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1975.tb00326.x
[10] Brook, A.H. & Smith, J.M., The aetiology of developmental defects of enamel: a prevalence and family study in East London, U.K. Connective Tissue Research, 39(1–3), pp. 151–156, 1998. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/03008209809023921
[11] Morrees, C.F.A., Thomsen, S.O., Jenson, E. & Yen, P.K-J., Mesiodistal crown diameters of deciduous and permanent teeth in individuals. Journal of Dental Research, 36(1), pp. 39–47, 1957. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00220345570360011501
[12] Brook, A.H., A unifying aetiological explanation for anomalies of human tooth number and size. Archives of Oral Biology, 29(5), pp. 373–378, 1984. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/00039969(84)90163-8
[13] Shinn, D.L., Congenitally missing third molars in a British population. Journal of Dentistry, 4(1), pp. 42–44, 1975. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(76)90069-5
[14] Brook, A.H., Jernvall, J., Smith, R.N., Hughes. T.E. & Townsend, G.C., The dentition: the outcomes of morphogenesis leading to variations of tooth number, size and shape. Australian
Dental Journal, 59(1 Suppl), pp. 131–142, 2014. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/adj.12160
[15] Brook, A.H., Griffin, R.C., Smith, R.N., Townsend, G.C., Kaur, G., Davies, G.R. & Fearne, J., Tooth size patterns in patients with hypodontia and supernumerary teeth. Archives of Oral Biology,
54(Suppl 1), pp. S63–S70, 2009. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2008.05.016
[16] McKeown, H.F., Robinson, D.L., Elcock, C., Al-Sharood, M. & Brook, A.H., Tooth dimensions in hypodontia patients, their unaffected relatives and control group, measured by a new image analysis system. European Journal of Orthodontics, 24(2), pp. 131–141, 2002. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejo/24.2.131
[17] Khalaf, K., Robinson, D.L., Elcock, C., Smith, R.N. & Brook, A.H., Tooth size in patients with supernumerary teeth and a control group measured by an image analysis system. Archives of Oral Biology, 50(2), pp. 243–248, 2005. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2004.09.013
[18] Brook, A.H., Multilevel complex interactions between genetic, epigenetic and environmental factors in the aetiology of anomalies of dental development. Archives of Oral Biology, 54( Suppl 1), pp. S3–S17, 2009. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2009.09.005
[19] Small, B.W. & Murray, M.J., Enamel opacities: prevalence, classifications and aetiological considerations. Journal of Dentistry, 6(1), pp. 33–42, 1978. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/03005712(78)90004-0
[20] Chen, H.S., Tsai, Y.C., Chen, K.K. & Hsu K.J., Detrimental effects of maternal lead exposure during pregnancy and lactation on molar development in the young rat. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 89(2), pp. 240–244, 2012. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/s00128-012-0683-y
[21] Zambrano, E., Marinez-Samayoa, P.M., Bautista, C.J., Deás, M., Guillén, L., R odriguesGonzález,G.L., Guzmán, C., Larrea, F. & Nathanielsz P.W., Sex differences in transgenerational alterations of growth and metabolism in progeny (F2) of female offspring (F1) of rats fed a low protein diet during pregnancy and lactation. Journal of Physiology, 566(1), pp. 225–236,
2005. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2005.086462