OPEN ACCESS
“Empire building” is a phenomenon that dominates today’s research landscape. Large groups, national priorities and research centers dwarf the spontaneous individual investigators. Administrators and the thirst for higher rankings encourage this trend. Yet, the individuals do not disappear. This paper explains why. It attributes the emergence of the large group to the pursuit of greater visibility for the institution as a whole. The visibility (V) is modeled as a product of the production (P) of ideas in the institution, and the support (S) that the institution secures for the production of ideas. The coalescence of some investigators into a large group tends to increase S and decrease P. On the other hand, an increase in the number of individual investigators has the opposite effect. From this trade-off emerge the main and well-known features of contemporary research organization: the proportionality between the size of the large group and the size of the entire institution, the strong relationship between the visibility of an institution and its size, and the fact that large groups occurred first in the largest and most research-intensive institutions. The paper also shows that as the incentives for large-group research become stronger, smaller and smaller institutions find it beneficial to abandon the individual investigator mode and seek a balance between research empires and individual investigators. The individual researcher will not disappear.
academic mafias, constructal theory, dark networks, research organization, self-organization
[1] Comte, A., Cours de philosophie positive, Présentation et notes par Michel Serres, François Dagognet, Allal Sinaceur, Hermann, Paris, 1975, tome I, p. 45 (deuxième leçon).
[2] Turner, J.S., The Tinkerer’s Accomplice, Harvard University Press: Harvard, MA, 2007.
[3] Miguel, A.F., Constructal pattern formation in stony corals, bacterial colonies and plant roots under different hydrodynamic conditions. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 242, pp. 954–961, 2006.
[4] Biondini, M., Allometric scaling laws for water uptake by plant roots. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 251, pp. 35–59, 2008.
[5] Reis, A.H., Miguel, A.F. & Aydin, M., Constructal theory of fl ow architecture of the lungs. Medical Physics, 31, pp. 1135–1140, 2004.
[6] von Herbing, I.H., The physiological basis for metabolic scaling in animals: a developing perspective. Comparative Developmental Physiology. Contributions, Tools, and Trends, eds S.J. Warburton et al., Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, pp. 83–98, 2006.
[7] Miller, P., Swarm theory. National Geographic, pp. 126–147, July 2007.
[8] Bejan, A., Advanced Engineering Thermodynamics (2nd ed.), Wiley: New York, 1997.
[9] Bejan, A., Shape and Structure, from Engineering to Nature, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2000.
[10] Poirier, H., One theory explains the intelligence of nature. Science & Vie, 1034, pp. 44–63, 2003.
[11] Reis, A.H., Constructal theory: from engineering to physics, and how fl ow systems develop shape and structure. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 59, pp. 269–282, 2006.
[12] Bachta, A., Dhombres, J. & Kremer-Marietti, A., Three Studies on the Constructal Law of Adrian Bejan, L’Harmattan: Paris, 2008.
[13] Bejan, A. & Merkx, G.W., eds., Constructal Theory of Social Dynamics, Springer: New York, 2007.
[14] Bejan, A., Lorente, S., Miguel, A.F. & Reis, A.H., Constructal theory of distribution of city sizes (Section 13.4). Advanced Engineering Thermodynamics, 3rd edn., ed. A. Bejan, Wiley: Hoboken, 2006.
[15] Bejan, A., Why university rankings do not change: education as a natural hierarchical fl ow architecture. International Journal of Design & Nature, 2(4), pp. 319–327, 2007.
[16] Soler, J.J., Moller, A.P. & Soler, M., Mafi a behavior and the evolution of facultative virulence. J. Theor. Biol., 191, pp. 267–277, 1998.
[17] Clark, B.R., The many pathways of academic coordination. Higher Education, 9, pp. 251–267, 1979.
[18] Chaput de Saintonage, M. & Pavlovic, A., Cheating. Medical Education, 38, pp. 8–9, 2004.
[19] News: Italy continues R&D reforms. Nature Medicine, 4(9), p. 993, 1998.
[20] Xu, J. & Chen, H., The topology of dark networks. Communications of the ACM, 51(10), pp. 58–65, 2008.
[21] Bejan, A. & Lorente, S., Design with Constructal Theory, Wiley: Hoboken, 2008.